Disagreement Hierarchy Scoring Tool

Disagreement Hierarchy Scoring Tool
The comment of the argument in question includes the following elements:
Name calling (minus 1 point) Ad Hominem attack - an attack on the person rather than on their ideas (no points) Response to tone - opposes the writing, not the content (no points) Contradiction - states an opposing case without supporting evidence (no points) Counterargument - states an opposing case with some evidence, but does not address a specific part of the case (plus 1 point) Refutation of a minor or lessor point - finds a problem with a specific part of the case, but not the main part (plus 5 points) Refutation of the central point - identifies a problem with the main part of the case (plus 10 points)
Score --> numberscore1=(variable_1)
Interpretation --> resultscore2=(variable_1);score2>9?'Powerful and convincing argument':score2>4?'Weakly convincing argument':score2>0?'Possibly convincing argument':'Unconvincing argument'
Reference (Hide/Show)
#1 based on Paul Graham's March 2008 Essay entitled 'How to Disagree'.

Disagreement Hierarchy Scoring Tool

Result - Copy and paste this output: